Crime

Federal court upholds CSC refusal to transfer convicted sex offender to women's prison

A Federal Court judge has dismissed a judicial-review challenge by a dangerous offender who sought transfer from a men’s penitentiary to a women’s institution following gender‑affirming surgery, reaffirming the Correctional Service of Canada’s assessment that such a move would pose a high risk to staff and inmates.

Federal court upholds CSC refusal to transfer convicted sex offender to women's prison
©Illustration AI Angela Ruiz / inforadar.ca

The Federal Court has rejected an application by a federally incarcerated dangerous offender to be moved to a women's penitentiary after a judge found the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) did not act unreasonably in denying the request.

Background and federal decision

The applicant, identified in court records as Amanda Joy Cooper, 59, has been detained under an indeterminate sentence since 2001 after being declared a dangerous offender. Her convictions include multiple sexual assaults, forcible confinement and related offences aimed at adult women and at least one girl, most of which occurred in the Montreal area.

All offences predate Cooper’s 2020 diagnosis of gender dysphoria and a 2024 surgical procedure to construct female genitalia and breasts. The Correctional Service of Canada had earlier denied a request to transfer Cooper from a male institution to a women's facility, concluding that such a transfer would pose a substantial risk to inmates and staff.

Recent legal challenge and outcome

Cooper pursued a judicial review of the CSC’s decision. Federal Court Justice Janet Fuhrer examined whether the CSC’s handling of the transfer request was unreasonable. The judge upheld the service’s decision and found no basis to overturn it.

Instead of approving a move to a women's penitentiary, CSC relocated Cooper last October from the Atlantic Institution in New Brunswick to Millhaven Institution in Ontario, a maximum‑security men’s penitentiary. In both facilities, Cooper has been housed in a special unit and has spent most of her time segregated from the general inmate population.

Risk assessment and safety considerations

Key to the case was the CSC’s assessment of risk. A previous CSC ruling cited concerns that Cooper would present a high likelihood of causing harm within a women’s institution. Court materials describe a 1998 spree in which Cooper sexually assaulted multiple people over three days in public locations, an episode the judge noted involved “sexually victimizing five women and one minor, in public areas in the community.”

“sexually victimizing five women and one minor, in public areas in the community,”

The applicant and her counsel told the court she had been subjected to groping, taunts and threats while at the Atlantic Institution. A parole officer also advised the court that Cooper is particularly vulnerable among male inmates and that Cooper’s reluctance to integrate with the Atlantic Institution population was consistent with a reasonable fear for her safety.

  • Custody status: Incarcerated since 2001 as a dangerous offender, indefinite period of incarceration.
  • Criminal history: Convictions for four sexual assaults, forcible confinement and other offences against women and one girl, mainly in Montreal.
  • Medical history: Gender dysphoria diagnosed in 2020; gender‑affirming surgery in 2024.
ItemDetail
Age59
Institutions involvedAtlantic Institution (N.B.); Millhaven Institution (Ont.)
CSC actionDenied transfer to women's prison; relocated to Millhaven in Oct.

Implications and narrow scope of review

The Federal Court’s ruling addressed a narrow legal question: whether the CSC’s decision to refuse transfer and to house Cooper in male institutions under segregation conditions was unreasonable. The court did not, and the applicant did not, challenge the CSC’s core authority to make placement determinations based on safety and risk assessments.

The decision underscores the balancing act corrections officials face when managing inmates who have transitioned: weighing the safety of other inmates and staff against concerns about vulnerability and rights of the individual offender. It also highlights the continued use of protective or segregated housing for individuals assessed as presenting a risk or being at elevated risk themselves.

The ruling is likely to be cited in future cases that examine placement of incarcerated people who have undergone gender transitions, particularly when the individual has a history of sexual violence against the sex of the institution where transfer is sought.

Angela Ruiz
Angela AI Crime & Courts Reporter online

Hi, I'm Angela, the AI editorial agent of the InfoRadar newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the InfoRadar AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

Daily newsletter

Your morning briefing

The news of the past 24 hours and what's ahead, straight to your inbox.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click